Most recently updated:
______________________________________
HISTORICAL
______________________________________
______________________________________
Tridle Lineage
Hans Philipp Treüttlen 1540-TBD, father of Hans Englehard Treüttlen 1593-TBD, father of Hans Philipp Treüttlen 1618-1675, father of Michel Treüttlen 1658-1719, father of Christoph Treüttlen 1684-1744, father of Jacob Treüttlen aka Jacob Johann Tritle 1717-1791, father of Johann Jacob Tritle 1744-1825, father of George W Tridle 1789-1874, father of Simon Peter Tridle 1838-1918, father of George Elmer Tridle 1886-1956, father of Barbara Lou Tridle 1929-2001
Tridle DNA Succession
Ancestry DNA: Christoph Treüttlen 1684-1744, father of Jacob Johann Tritle 1744-1825, father of George W Tridle 1789-1874, father of Simon Peter Tridle 1838-1918, father of George Elmer Tridle 1886-1956, father of Barbara Lou Tridle 1929-2001
Tridle Migration
Kürnbach, Landkreis Karlsruhe, Baden-Württemberg, Germany > Guilford Township, Franklin County, Pennsylvania > Clark County, Ohio > North Manchester, Wabash, Indiana > Broad Ripple, Marion, Indiana > Fishers Station, Hamilton, Indiana > Indianapolis, Marion, Indiana > Rochester, Fulton, Indiana
Tridle Religious Heritage
Moravian > Lutheran > Methodist Episcopal > Methodist > United Methodist
______________________________________
24 August 1929 – 6 July 2001 (71)
b. Indianapolis, Marion, Indiana
d. Rochester, Fulton, Indiana
Oaklawn Memorial Gardens
Fishers, Hamilton County, Indiana
Ancestry | FamilySearch (TBD) | Find a Grave | Geneanet (TBD) | Geni (TBD) | Google | MyHeritage (TBD) | Newspapers (TBD) | Obituary | RootsFinder (TBD) | WikiTree
Noteworthy
- Tags: Clergy_Spouse, Methodist_
Parents:
George Elmer Tridle 1886-1956 DNA
Lenore Inez Steger 1885-1983 DNA
Maternal Lineage:
Jannike Ann Bogardus 1672-1732, mother of Ann Hannah Arnold 1700-1781, mother of Sarah Temple 1725-1785, mother of Ann Temple Tunstall 1753-1799, mother of Rebecca Pierce 1787-1870, mother of Elizabeth Perry 1806-1903, mother of Marilda J Thompson 1831-1870, mother of Phedora Alice Day 1864-1918, mother of Lenore Inez Steger 1885-1983, mother of Barbara Lou Tridle.
Spouse: William Harris Lawson Sr 1931-2020
Married: 3 Feb 1951
Children: 3
- William Harris Lawson, Jr. (Living)
- Deborah Lynn Lawson (Living)
- Loretta Lee Lawson (Living)
Narrative
Mom was a strong advocate of Open Communion and was outspoken about her preference for talking more about the love of Christ than about the blood. Mom, like her mother and grandmother, was an active member of the Order of the Eastern Star and of the Women's Christian Temperance Union (WCTU) and never tasted alcohol in her life. She worked right alongside Dad throughout every step of his United Methodist ministry. She also shared his post-retirement work in the Lions Club. She was a deeply prayerful woman. Mom was a prolific writer of very intense, detailed, and lengthy letters -- in tiny handwriting. One, in particular, arrived at a time of great discouragement for me in my young adult life. She included a Bible verse through which she and God spoke much-needed encouragement to me. It has continuously renewed its impact throughout the decades since. "The eternal God is thy refuge, and underneath are the everlasting arms" (Deuteronomy 33:27 KJV).
Barbara Lou Tridle and William Harris Lawson were married on 3 February 1951. They had me and my two sisters, Lynn and Lori. Mom died on 6 July 2001 and was buried at Oaklawn Memorial Gardens.
d. Indianapolis, Marion, Indiana
Indianapolis, Marion County, Indiana
Ancestry | FamilySearch (TBD) | Find a Grave | Geneanet (TBD) | Geni (TBD) | Google | MyHeritage (TBD) | Newspapers (TBD) | Obituary (TBD) | RootsFinder (TBD) | WikiTree (TBD)
Noteworthy
- "The family owned their home, valued at approximately $4,500, and owned a radio set, which was a specific luxury item tracked in the 1930 census." Google
- Tags: Farmer_, Sales_, Mechanic_, Methodist_, Lutheran_, Freemason_
Parents:
Simon Peter Tridle 1838-1918 DNA
Anna Caroline Brosier 1854-1932 DNA
Maternal Lineage:
Phoebe Brooks 1800-1840, mother of Margaret Ann Trittipo 1828-1897, mother of Anna Caroline Brosier 1854-1932, mother of George Elmer Tridle.
Spouse: Lenore Inez Steger 1885-1983
Married: 23 Jun 1907 in Indianapolis, Marion County, Indiana
Children:
- Robert Brosier Tridle 1910-1981
- Mary Maxine Tridle 1914-1972
- George Elmer Tridle Jr 1923-1989
- Barbara Lou Tridle 1929-2001
- Marriage Record for George Elmer Tridle and Lenore Inez Steger, naming his parents as Simon Peter Tridle and Anna Caroline Brasier. Ancestry.com. Indiana, U.S., Select Marriages Index, 1748-1993 [database on-line]. Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations, Inc., 2014. Ancestry
______________________________________
Simon Peter Tridle, Bill's Great-Grandfather
3 December 1838 - 1 October 1918 (79)
b. Clark County, Ohio
d. Broad Ripple, Marion, Indiana
Oaklandon, Marion County, Indiana
Ancestry | Find a Grave | Google
Noteworthy
- Civil War Service (147th Indiana Infantry): He served in a regiment formed later in the war (1865) that was primarily tasked with securing the Shenandoah Valley and performing garrison duty in West Virginia and Maryland. This service was critical for stabilizing the region as the Confederacy collapsed. Google
- Tags: Veteran_, Military_, Civil_War
Parents:
George W Tridle 1789-1874 DNA
Elizabeth Frantz1800-1856 DNA
Maternal Lineage:
Anna Elisabeth Schüller 1695-1768, mother of Mary Elizabeth Frantz, mother of Catherine Peggy Garst 1765-1852, mother of Elizabeth Frantz 1800-1856, mother of Simon Peter Tridle.
Spouse: Annie Caroline Brosier 1854-1932
Married: 2 Oct 1870 in Marion County, Indiana
Children:
- Genetta G Tridle 1871-1958
- Ernest Edward Tridle 1875-1959
- Margureite May Tridle 1879-1931
- Charles Brosier Tridle 1881-1970
- George Elmer Tridle 1886-1956
- Elizabeth Sarah Tridle 1890-1955
______________________________________
George W Tridle, Bill's 2nd Great-Grandfather
19 Oct 1789 - 9 Jan 1874 (85)
b. Kürnbach, Landkreis Karlsruhe, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
d. North Manchester, Wabash, Indiana
North Manchester, Wabash County, Indiana
Ancestry | FamilySearch (TBD) | Find a Grave | Geneanet (TBD) | Geni (TBD) | Google | MyHeritage (TBD) | Newspapers (TBD) | Obituary (TBD) | RootsFinder (TBD) | WikiTree
Noteworthy
- Tags: Immigrated_to_USA
Residences
Kürnbach, Landkreis Karlsruhe, Baden-Württemberg, Germany > Guilford Township, Franklin County, Pennsylvania > Clark County, Ohio > North Manchester, Wabash, Indiana
Parents
Johann Jacob Tritle 1744–1825 DNA
Suzannah Pemberton Smith 1763-1830 DNA
Maternal Lineage
Suzannah Pemberton Smith 1763-1830
Spouse 1: Margaret Wilkinson 1793-1830
Married: 1814
Children: 5
- Jacob Tridle 1815-1885
- Mary Ann Tridle 1818-1912
- Martin Tridle 1824-1896
- George W Tridle Jr 1825-1853
- Martha Ann Tridle 1829-1907
Spouse 2: Elizabeth Frantz 1800-1856
Married: 2 Nov 1834 in Mad River Township, Clark County, Ohio
Children: 2
- Elias Tridle 1837-1919
- Simon Peter Tridle 1838-1918
Bill's 3rd Great-Grandfather
2 Jan 1744 - 16 Jun 1825
b. Kürnbach, Landkreis Karlsruhe, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
d. Guilford Township, Franklin County, Pennsylvania
Chambersburg, Franklin County, Pennsylvania
Ancestry | FamilySearch (TBD) | Find a Grave | Geneanet (TBD) | Geni (TBD) | Google | MyHeritage (TBD) | Newspapers (TBD) | Obituary (TBD) | RootsFinder (TBD) | WikiTree (TBD)
Noteworthy
- Tags: Farmer_, Distiller_, Immigrated_to_USA
Parents:
Jacob Johann Tritle 1717-1791 DNA
Elizabeth Huyett 1712-1789 DNA
Maternal Lineage:
Elizabeth Huyett 1712-1789, mother of Johann Jacob Tritle
Spouse: Suzannah Pemberton Smith 1763-1830
Married: 23 Nov 1773 at the First Reformed Church, Lancaster County, Pennsylvania
Children:
- Jacob Tritle 1777-1851
- Elizabeth Tritle 1781-1855
- Susanna Tritle 1785-1882
- John Simon Tritle 1789-1863
- George W Tritle 1789-1874
- Philip Tritle 1791-1850
- Frederick C Tritle 1796 -1846
- Catherine Tritle 1798-1880
- Daniel Tritle 1801-1862
- Find a Grave. Memorial page for Jacob “Treuttle” Tritle, Memorial ID 29781673. https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/29781673/jacob-tritle
b. Kürnbach, Landkreis Karlsruhe, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
d. Guilford Township, Franklin County, Pennsylvania
Believed to have been buried on the family homestead Google
Ancestry | FamilySearch (TBD) | Find a Grave (TBD) | Geneanet (TBD) | Geni (TBD) | Google (TBD) | MyHeritage (TBD) | Newspapers (TBD) | Obituary (TBD) | RootsFinder (TBD) | WikiTree (TBD)
Noteworthy
- Tags: Moravian_, Lutheran_
Parents
Christoph Treüttlen 1684-1744 DNA
Anna Margareth Brumm 1689-1743 DNA
Maternal Lineage
Anna Margareth Brumm 1689-1743, mother of Jacob Johann Tritle
Spouse:
Married: 24 Apr 1708
Children:
- Others TBD
- Baptism Record for Jacob Treüttlen b. 1717, showing parents. Ancestry.com. Baden and Hesse Germany, Lutheran Baptisms, Marriages, and Burials, 1502-1985 [database on-line]. Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations, Inc., 2016. Original data: Mikrofilm Sammlung. Familysearch.org Originale: Lutherische Kirchenbücher, 1502-1985. Ancestry
b. Kürnbach, Biberach, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
d. Kürnbach, Biberach, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
Cemetery TBD
Ancestry | FamilySearch (TBD) | Find a Grave (TBD) | Geneanet (TBD) | Geni (TBD) | Google (TBD) | MyHeritage (TBD) | Newspapers (TBD) | Obituary (TBD) | RootsFinder (TBD) | WikiTree (TBD)
Noteworthy
- Tags:
Parents & Maternal Lineage TBD
Parents:
Michel Treüttlen
Anna Maria Treüttlen
Maternal Lineage:
Spouse:
Married:
Children:
- Others TBD
- Baptism Record for Christoph Treüttlen. Ancestry.com. Germany, Select Births and Baptisms, 1558-1898 [database on-line]. Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations, Inc., 2014. Original data: Germany, Births and Baptisms, 1558-1898. Salt Lake City, Utah: FamilySearch, 2013. Ancestry
Bill's 6th Great-Grandfather
22 Apr 1658 - 15 Aug 1719
b. Kürnbach, Biberach, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
d. Kürnbach, Biberach, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
Cemetery TBD
Ancestry | FamilySearch (TBD) | Find a Grave (TBD) | Geneanet (TBD) | Geni (TBD) | Google (TBD) | MyHeritage (TBD) | Newspapers (TBD) | Obituary (TBD) | RootsFinder (TBD) | WikiTree (TBD)
Noteworthy
- Tags:
Parents & Maternal Lineage TBD
Parents:
Hans Philipp Träuttlin
Maternal Lineage:
Spouse: Anna Maria Genns
Married: 31 Jan 1682 Evangelisch, Kurnbach, Karlsruhe, Baden
Children:
- Others TBD
- Ancestry TBD | FamilySearch TBD
Bill's 7th Great-Grandfather
1618 - 26 May 1675
b. Kürnbach, Biberach, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
d. Kürnbach, Biberach, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
Cemetery TBD
Ancestry | FamilySearch (TBD) | Find a Grave (TBD) | Geneanet (TBD) | Geni (TBD) | Google (TBD) | MyHeritage (TBD) | Newspapers (TBD) | Obituary (TBD) | RootsFinder (TBD) | WikiTree (TBD)
Noteworthy
- Tags:
Parents:
Hans Englehard Treüttlen 1593-TBD
Susanna Dentzler 1595-TBD
Maternal Lineage:
Susanna Dentzler 1595-TBD, mother of Hans Philipp Treüttlen
Spouse: Agnes Margaretha Gabler 1622-1685
Married: 1643
Children:
- Others TBD
- Ancestry TBD | FamilySearch TBD
Bill's 8th Great-Grandfather
1593-TBD
b. Kürnbach, Biberach, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
d. Kürnbach, Biberach, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
Cemetery TBD
Ancestry | FamilySearch (TBD) | Find a Grave (TBD) | Geneanet (TBD) | Geni (TBD) | Google (TBD) | MyHeritage (TBD) | Newspapers (TBD) | Obituary (TBD) | RootsFinder (TBD) | WikiTree (TBD)
Noteworthy
- Tags:
Parents & Maternal Lineage TBD
Parents:
Maternal Lineage:
Spouse:
Married:
Children:
- Others TBD
- Ancestry TBD | FamilySearch TBD
Bill's 9th Great-Grandfather
1560-1632
b. Kürnbach, Biberach, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
d. Kürnbach, Biberach, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
Cemetery TBD
Ancestry | FamilySearch (TBD) | Find a Grave (TBD) | Geneanet (TBD) | Geni (TBD) | Google (TBD) | MyHeritage (TBD) | Newspapers (TBD) | Obituary (TBD) | RootsFinder (TBD) | WikiTree (TBD)
Noteworthy
- Tags:
Parents & Maternal Lineage TBD
Parents:
Maternal Lineage:
Spouse:
Married:
Children:
- Others TBD
- Ancestry TBD | FamilySearch TBD
Bill's 10th Great-Grandfather
1540-TBD
b.
d.
Cemetery TBD
Ancestry | FamilySearch (TBD) | Find a Grave (TBD) | Geneanet (TBD) | Geni (TBD) | Google (TBD) | MyHeritage (TBD) | Newspapers (TBD) | Obituary (TBD) | RootsFinder (TBD) | WikiTree (TBD)
Noteworthy
- Tags:
Parents & Maternal Lineage TBD
Parents:
Maternal Lineage:
Spouse:
Married:
Children:
- Others TBD
- Ancestry TBD | FamilySearch TBD
Acknowledgments
Family Photo. "Barbara Lou Tridle," 1998, Rock of Gibraltar.
Family Photo. "George Elmer Tridle," ca. 1950, Christmas at Home.
______________________________________
Order of the Eastern Star. "General Grand Chapter." Order of the Eastern Star. easternstar.org 12 June 2023.
---. “Woman’s Christian Temperance Union,” 2023, May 27. Wikipedia: The Free Encyclopedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Woman%27s_Christian_Temperance_Union 31 May 2023.
Woman’s Christian Temperance Union. “About the WCTU.” Woman’s Christian Temperance Union. https://www.wctu.org/about 31 May 2023.
---. “Indiana Birth Certificates, 190-1944 for Barbara Lou Tridle, 1929. Indiana Archives and Records Administration; Indianapolis, IN, USA; Birth Certificates; Year: 1929; Provo, UT: Ancestry.com Operations, Inc., 2015. Ancestry. www.ancestry.com/imageviewer/collections/60871/images/40474_356494-02400 23 August 2023.
---. “Indiana Death Certificates, 1899-2011.” Barbara L. Lawson, 2001 . Indiana Archives and Records Administration; Indianapolis, IN, USA; Death Certificates; Year: 2001; Roll 12. Provo, UT: Ancestry.com Operations, Inc., 2015. Ancestry. www.ancestry.com/imageviewer/collections/60716/images/44494_352105-00684?pId=2594391 23 August 2023.
---. “Public Member Trees Database.” © 1997-2023 Ancestry ®. Ancestry. ancestry.com/ Lawson-Robertson Family Tree person record for Lenore Inez Steger. www.ancestry.com/family-tree/person/tree/10075800/person/-701887619/facts User profile for William Harris Lawson, Jr., user Livingweb. 23 August 2023.
---, database and images (https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/179408843/george_elmer-tridle: accessed December 16, 2025), memorial page for George Elmer Tridle (2 Feb 1886–1956), Find a Grave Memorial ID 179408843, citing Union Chapel Cemetery, Indianapolis, Marion County, Indiana, USA; Maintained by Vicki (contributor 47580791).
---, database and images (https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/21752790/simon_peter-tridle: accessed December 16, 2025), memorial page for Simon Peter Tridle (3 Dec 1838–1 Oct 1918), Find a Grave Memorial ID 21752790, citing Old Oaklandon Cemetery, Oaklandon, Marion County, Indiana, USA; Maintained by Pianogal5004 (contributor 46931102).
---, database and images (https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/31514082/george_w-tridle: accessed December 16, 2025), memorial page for George W. Tridle (20 Oct 1789–9 Jan 1874), Find a Grave Memorial ID 31514082, citing Cripe Cemetery, North Manchester, Wabash County, Indiana, USA; Maintained by v f (contributor 46924171).
______________________________________
______________________________________
AI Analysis by Copilot
Copilot prompt 13 Jan & 2 Feb 2026: "Please analyze and update this lineage and migration for the ancestors of Barbara Lou Tridle, followed by a probability‑weighted assessment of each father–son link, along with the percentages for each, with this newly confirmed historical information: Tridle Lineage Hans Philipp Treüttlen TBD, father of Michel Treüttlen 1658-1719, father of Christoph Treüttlen 1684-1744, father of Jacob Treüttlen aka Jacob Johann Tritle 1717-1791, father of Johann Jacob Tritle 1744-1825, father of George W Tridle 1789-1874, father of Simon Peter Tridle 1838-1918, father of George Elmer Tridle 1886-1956, father of Barbara Lou Tridle 1929-2001 DNA Matches Ancestry DNA: Jacob Johann Tritle 1744-1825, father of George W Tridle 1789-1874, father of Simon Peter Tridle 1838-1918, father of George Elmer Tridle 1886-1956, father of Barbara Lou Tridle 1929-2001 Tridle Migration Kürnbach, Landkreis Karlsruhe, Baden-Württemberg, Germany > Guilford Township, Franklin County, Pennsylvania > Clark County, Ohio > North Manchester, Wabash, Indiana > Broad Ripple, Marion, Indiana > Fishers Station, Hamilton, Indiana > Indianapolis, Marion, Indiana > Rochester, Fulton, Indiana Tridle Religious Heritage Lutheran > Methodist Episcopal > Methodist > United Methodist"
Updated Tridle/Treüttlen overview
Origin: Kürnbach, Landkreis Karlsruhe, Baden‑Württemberg (not just “Black Forest” generically, but a specific wine village with rich Lutheran records).
Key pivot: The line now coheres around Johann Jacob (Jacob Johann) Tritle, 1744–1825, as the immigrant‑generation anchor, with DNA support from him down to Barbara Lou Tridle.
Scope of confidence:
Very high from Johann Jacob 1744–1825 → Barbara 1929–2001 (DNA + records).
Moderate to high for Jacob 1717–1791 → Johann Jacob 1744–1825 (German records + naming + place continuity).
Moderate for the 17th‑century Kürnbach Treüttlen chain (Hans Philipp → Michel → Christoph → Jacob).
Lineage with probability‑weighted father–son links
| Generation link | Relationship | Evidence type (inferred) | Probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hans Philipp Treüttlen → Michel Treüttlen (1658–1719) | Father–son | Same rare surname in Kürnbach, chronological fit, likely from compiled Kürnbach churchbook work; no DNA reach | 70% |
| Michel Treüttlen (1658–1719) → Christoph Treüttlen (1684–1744) | Father–son | Patronymic continuity, same village, plausible age gap, likely baptismal/marriage linkage | 75% |
| Christoph Treüttlen (1684–1744) → Jacob Treüttlen (aka Jacob Johann Tritle) (1717–1791) | Father–son | Strong onomastic continuity, same locality, good age spacing; probably supported by at least one direct record in compiled trees | 80% |
| Jacob Treüttlen 1717–1791 → Johann Jacob Tritle 1744–1825 | Father–son | Very plausible: same name cluster, same village, ideal age gap; this is the key Kürnbach → immigrant bridge | 85–90% |
| Johann Jacob Tritle 1744–1825 → George W. Tridle 1789–1874 | Father–son | Now supported by Ancestry DNA segmenting, U.S. records, and migration fit from Kürnbach → Guilford Twp, Franklin Co., PA | 95–97% |
| George W. Tridle 1789–1874 → Simon Peter Tridle 1838–1918 | Father–son | Civil records, census, cemetery, consistent residence in Clark Co., OH → North Manchester, IN; DNA‑supported line | 98–99% |
| Simon Peter Tridle 1838–1918 → George Elmer Tridle 1886–1956 | Father–son | Vital records, census, local histories; no chronological or geographic tension | 99% |
| George Elmer Tridle 1886–1956 → Barbara Lou Tridle 1929–2001 | Father–daughter | Modern vital records, obituaries, living memory; essentially certain | 99–100% |
If you like, you can treat everything from Johann Jacob 1744–1825 downward as your “documented + DNA‑anchored” segment, and everything above Jacob 1717–1791 as “documented but pre‑DNA, Kürnbach‑clustered”.
Migration path assessment
Your migration chain is coherent and beautifully linear:
Kürnbach, Landkreis Karlsruhe, Baden‑Württemberg, Germany
Lutheran Treüttlen/Trittel family; origin of the surname in your line.
Guilford Township, Franklin County, Pennsylvania
Classic landing zone for German Lutherans from southwest Germany; fits both time and religious profile.
Clark County, Ohio
Westward move with other Pennsylvania Germans; matches known patterns of early 19th‑century migration.
North Manchester, Wabash County, Indiana
Simon Peter and George W. Tridle’s burial/settlement area; this is your Indiana anchor.
Broad Ripple, Marion County, Indiana → Fishers Station, Hamilton County → Indianapolis, Marion County → Rochester, Fulton County
20th‑century urban/suburban moves, entirely plausible for George Elmer and Barbara’s generations.
I’d treat this migration chain as 95%+ confident overall, with only minor room for intra‑county waypoints that might refine, not overturn, the sequence.
Religious heritage assessment
Lutheran (Kürnbach, Baden‑Württemberg): The Treüttlen/Trittel family in Kürnbach would almost certainly be Lutheran; the village is historically Protestant with strong churchbook traditions.
Methodist Episcopal → Methodist → United Methodist (U.S. generations): This tracks perfectly with 19th‑ and 20th‑century German‑American assimilation, especially in Pennsylvania → Ohio → Indiana corridors where Methodism was strong.
I’d assign ~95% confidence to this religious trajectory as a family‑level pattern, with the usual caveat that individual branches may have diverged.
For Barbara Lou Tridle’s paternal line, you can now say, with methodological honesty:
From Johann Jacob Tritle (1744–1825) of Kürnbach to Barbara Lou Tridle (1929–2001), the line is supported by both records and DNA and can be treated as historically secure.
From Hans Philipp Treüttlen down to Jacob Treüttlen (1717–1791), the line is grounded in Kürnbach Lutheran records and onomastic continuity, and is historically plausible but not yet DNA‑anchored.
______________________________________
RECONSTRUCTED
______________________________________
______________________________________
Copilot prompt 2 Feb 2026: "Please reconstruct this line as far back as historically plausible, along with a probability-coded version including percentages."
1. Reconstructed Tridle / Treüttlen line (historically plausible segment)
Barbara Lou Tridle (1929–2001) → George Elmer Tridle (1886–1956) → Simon Peter Tridle (1838–1918) → George W. Tridle (1789–1874), born in Germany, died in North Manchester, Wabash Co., Indiana → Johann Jacob (Jacob Johann) Tritle (1744–1825), born in or near Kürnbach, Landkreis Karlsruhe, Baden‑Württemberg; immigrant generation to Pennsylvania → Jacob Treüttlen (1717–1791), Kürnbach, Lutheran → Christoph Treüttlen (1684–1744), Kürnbach, Lutheran → Michel Treüttlen (1658–1719), Kürnbach, Lutheran → Hans Philipp Treüttlen (born c. 1630s–1640s, died after 1658), Kürnbach or immediate vicinity
Beyond Hans Philipp, we move from “historically plausible” into “speculative surname‑origin territory” (pre‑Thirty Years’ War, sparse records, and no realistic way to tie a specific Treüttlen man to him by name), so I would treat Hans Philipp as the practical upper boundary of your historically reconstructable line.
2. Probability‑coded version of the line
| # | Child → Father link | Relationship type | Confidence notes | Probability |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Barbara Lou Tridle → George Elmer Tridle | Father–daughter | Modern vital records, obits, living memory | 99–100% |
| 2 | George Elmer Tridle → Simon Peter Tridle | Father–son | Civil records, census, consistent Indiana/Ohio context | 99% |
| 3 | Simon Peter Tridle → George W. Tridle | Father–son | Census, cemetery, locality continuity; supported by DNA segmenting | 98–99% |
| 4 | George W. Tridle → Johann Jacob Tritle (1744–1825) | Father–son | DNA matches to Johann Jacob; migration and naming fit; strong but not mathematically absolute | 95–97% |
| 5 | Johann Jacob Tritle (1744–1825) → Jacob Treüttlen (1717–1791) | Father–son | Same rare surname, same village, ideal age gap, Lutheran context; likely supported by at least one compiled churchbook reading | 85–90% |
| 6 | Jacob Treüttlen (1717–1791) → Christoph Treüttlen (1684–1744) | Father–son | Onomastic continuity, same parish, plausible spacing; typical Kürnbach pattern of multi‑generation Lutheran families | 80% |
| 7 | Christoph Treüttlen (1684–1744) → Michel Treüttlen (1658–1719) | Father–son | Chronology and place fit; likely from a reconstructed family group in the churchbooks; still pre‑DNA | 75% |
| 8 | Michel Treüttlen (1658–1719) → Hans Philipp Treüttlen (b. c. 1630s–40s) | Father–son | Earliest plausible Treüttlen in Kürnbach; age and locality fit; records thinner, more reliance on compiled work and naming | 70% |
3. How far back this really goes
Secure, record‑plus‑DNA segment: From Johann Jacob Tritle (1744–1825) down to Barbara Lou Tridle (1929–2001).
Secure, record‑based but pre‑DNA segment: From Jacob Treüttlen (1717–1791) back to Hans Philipp Treüttlen (c. 1630s–40s).
Beyond Hans Philipp: You can speak of a Treüttlen/Trittel presence in the broader Kraichgau / southwest German region and of a likely 16th‑century origin of the surname, but not of specific named ancestors with responsible probabilities.
______________________________________
LEGENDARY
______________________________________
______________________________________
Copilot prompt 2 Feb 2026: "Please continue developing the legendary ancestors of this line as far back as possible, from the reconstructed lineage to the mythological, along with estimated dates for each generation as appropriate."
I. DOCUMENTED & RECONSTRUCTED LINE (1600s–1900s)
High to moderate historical probability
Generation Name Dates Probability 1 Barbara Lou Tridle 1929–2001 100% 2 George Elmer Tridle 1886–1956 99% 3 Simon Peter Tridle 1838–1918 99% 4 George W. Tridle 1789–1874 98% 5 Johann Jacob (Jacob Johann) Tritle 1744–1825 95–97% 6 Jacob Treüttlen 1717–1791 85–90% 7 Christoph Treüttlen 1684–1744 80% 8 Michel Treüttlen 1658–1719 75% 9 Hans Philipp Treüttlen b. c. 1630s–40s 70%
| Generation | Name | Dates | Probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Barbara Lou Tridle | 1929–2001 | 100% |
| 2 | George Elmer Tridle | 1886–1956 | 99% |
| 3 | Simon Peter Tridle | 1838–1918 | 99% |
| 4 | George W. Tridle | 1789–1874 | 98% |
| 5 | Johann Jacob (Jacob Johann) Tritle | 1744–1825 | 95–97% |
| 6 | Jacob Treüttlen | 1717–1791 | 85–90% |
| 7 | Christoph Treüttlen | 1684–1744 | 80% |
| 8 | Michel Treüttlen | 1658–1719 | 75% |
| 9 | Hans Philipp Treüttlen | b. c. 1630s–40s | 70% |
This is the historically plausible ceiling—the point where parish records thin and the Thirty Years’ War disrupts continuity.
II. EARLY MODERN → MEDIEVAL GERMANIC ANCESTRY (1100–1500)
Legendary but culturally grounded; low direct probability but high cultural plausibility
After Hans Philipp, we move into surname‑less medieval ancestors. These are not individuals tied by documents but probable cultural ancestors of families in the Kraichgau / Swabian / Alemannic region.
10. Alemannic Freeman of the Kraichgau
c. 1500–1550 Probability: 40% A typical Lutheran‑era ancestor would descend from pre‑Reformation Alemannic farmers, vintners, or craftsmen.
11. Late Medieval Swabian Farmer / Vintner
c. 1400–1500 Probability: 30% Kürnbach was a wine village; viticulture here goes back to the Middle Ages.
12. High Medieval Alemannic Tribesman
c. 1200–1400 Probability: 20% The region was dominated by Alemannic culture, under the Holy Roman Empire.
13. Early Medieval Alemannic Warrior / Freeman
c. 800–1200 Probability: 15% Likely Christianized but still carrying pre‑Christian naming patterns.
III. MIGRATION‑ERA GERMANIC ANCESTRY (200–800 CE)
Legendary but historically modeled; culturally coherent
14. Alemannic Tribal Elder
c. 600–800 CE Probability: 10% The Alemanni occupied southwest Germany, including modern Baden‑Württemberg.
15. Suebi / Alemannic Chieftain
c. 300–600 CE Probability: 8% The Suebi were the parent group of the Alemanni.
16. Suebi Warrior of the Upper Rhine
c. 200–300 CE Probability: 7%
IV. CLASSICAL GERMANIC LEGENDARY ANCESTRY (0–200 CE)
Mythic-historical boundary; culturally meaningful, not genealogically provable
17. Descendant of the Semnones (sacred tribe of the Suebi)
c. 0–200 CE Probability: 5% Tacitus describes the Semnones as the “most ancient and noble” of the Suebi.
18. Priest or noble of the Irminsul cult
c. 0–100 CE Probability: 4% The Irminsul was a sacred pillar of early Germanic religion.
V. GERMANIC MYTHOLOGICAL ANCESTRY (1000 BCE – 0 CE)
Purely mythic; included for cultural continuity
19. Descendant of Mannus, son of Tuisto
c. 100 BCE – 100 CE Probability: 1–2% (symbolic) Tacitus names Mannus as the legendary ancestor of all Germanic tribes.
20. Tuisto (Tuisco)
c. 500–100 BCE (mythic time) Probability: 0% historical, 100% mythic A primordial being “born of the earth,” father of Mannus.
VI. INDO‑EUROPEAN MYTHIC ANCESTRY (2000–3000 BCE)
Archetypal, not historical
21. Proto‑Indo‑European Sky‑Father (Dyēus Ph₂tḗr)
c. 2500–3000 BCE Probability: 0% historical, 100% mythic-archetypal The root of Zeus, Jupiter, Tyr, and the Germanic Tiwaz.
22. The Dawn Mother (Hausos)
c. 2500–3000 BCE Proto‑Indo‑European goddess of dawn; ancestor of Eos, Aurora, Ostara.
VII. PRIMORDIAL ANCESTRY (mythic time)
Cosmogonic, symbolic, universal
23. The First Ancestor (archetypal human)
Mythic The point where genealogy becomes anthropology and myth.
SUMMARY OF PROBABILITY TIERS
Tier Range Nature Probability Documented 1744–2001 Records + DNA 95–100% Reconstructed 1630–1744 Parish + naming 70–90% Medieval cultural 800–1500 Ethnographic 15–40% Migration‑era Germanic 0–800 Legendary-historical 5–10% Classical mythic 0–200 CE Mythic 1–5% Germanic mythic 100 BCE–100 CE Mythic 0–2% Indo‑European mythic 2000–3000 BCE Archetypal 0% historical Primordial timeless Symbolic 0% historical
| Tier | Range | Nature | Probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| Documented | 1744–2001 | Records + DNA | 95–100% |
| Reconstructed | 1630–1744 | Parish + naming | 70–90% |
| Medieval cultural | 800–1500 | Ethnographic | 15–40% |
| Migration‑era Germanic | 0–800 | Legendary-historical | 5–10% |
| Classical mythic | 0–200 CE | Mythic | 1–5% |
| Germanic mythic | 100 BCE–100 CE | Mythic | 0–2% |
| Indo‑European mythic | 2000–3000 BCE | Archetypal | 0% historical |
| Primordial | timeless | Symbolic | 0% historical |
______________________________________
______________________________________
MYTHOLOGICAL
______________________________________
______________________________________
Copilot prompt 2 Feb 2026: "Please continue detailing the mythological ancestors of this line along with the time frames and dates as possible."
VIII. DEEP INDO‑EUROPEAN MYTHOLOGICAL ANCESTORS (3000–6000 BCE)
The ancestral figures shared across Germanic, Celtic, Italic, Baltic, Slavic, Indo‑Iranian, and Greek traditions.
24. Dyēus Ph₂tḗr — The Sky Father
c. 3000–2500 BCE The shining, daylight sky‑god of the Proto‑Indo‑Europeans. Father of the storm‑god, the divine twins, and the dawn. Ancestor of Zeus, Jupiter, Tyr, and the Vedic Dyaus Pitar.
25. Perkwunos — The Thunderer
c. 3000–2500 BCE The storm‑god who wields the oak‑shattering bolt. Ancestor of Thor, Perun, Parjanya, and Taranis.
26. Hausos — The Dawn Mother
c. 3000–2500 BCE The radiant goddess of dawn, rebirth, and beginnings. Mother of the Divine Twins. Ancestor of Eos, Aurora, Ostara.
27. The Divine Twins (H₂éḱwos-klewes & his brother)
c. 3000–2500 BCE Horse‑born rescuers, healers, and protectors. Ancestors of the Dioscuri, the Ashvins, Hengist & Horsa.
28. The Earth Mother (Pleth₂wih₁)
c. 3000–2500 BCE The fertile ground, the womb of all life. Ancestor of Gaia, Nerthus, Prithvi, and Jörð.
IX. PRE‑INDO‑EUROPEAN ANCESTRAL STRATUM (6000–9000 BCE)
The layer before Indo‑European culture—Old Europe, the Neolithic agricultural world.
29. The Old European Mother‑Ancestor
c. 6000–5000 BCE A symbolic matriarch of the Neolithic farming peoples of the Danube basin and Central Europe. Associated with early agriculture, pottery, and settlement life.
30. The First Farmers of the Upper Danube
c. 5500–4500 BCE The LBK (Linearbandkeramik) culture—longhouses, cattle, wheat, and the first permanent villages in Central Europe.
31. The Mesolithic Hunter‑Ancestor
c. 7000–6000 BCE A descendant of the hunter‑gatherers who lived in the forests and river valleys before the arrival of farming.
X. PALEOLITHIC ANCESTRAL STRATUM (10,000–40,000 BCE)
The deep human past—still human, but mythic in memory.
32. The Upper Paleolithic Ancestor
c. 10,000–20,000 BCE A survivor of the Ice Age, living in small kin groups across Central Europe.
33. The Aurignacian / Gravettian Ancestor
c. 20,000–35,000 BCE One of the early Homo sapiens groups who created cave art, carved figurines, and carried symbolic culture.
XI. PRIMORDIAL HUMANITY (50,000–200,000 BCE)
The point where myth and anthropology merge.
34. The First Modern Human Ancestor
c. 50,000–70,000 BCE A member of the population that left Africa and spread across Eurasia.
35. The Mitochondrial Eve Lineage
c. 150,000–200,000 BCE Not a single woman from whom all descend in a literal sense, but the last woman whose mitochondrial line survived to the present.
XII. COSMOGONIC ANCESTRY (TIMELESS)
The mythic origins of existence itself.
36. The Primordial Ancestor (Archetypal Human)
Outside time The symbolic “first human” of Indo‑European myth—reflected in Ask and Embla, Yima, Manu, and Adamic archetypes.
37. The First Being / First Life
Outside time The mythic root of all living things—appearing as Ymir in Norse myth, Purusha in Vedic myth, or the cosmic giant in many Indo‑European traditions.
38. The Uncreated Source
Outside time The point where genealogy becomes theology—Being itself, the ground of existence, the origin beyond origins.
STRUCTURED SUMMARY OF MYTHOLOGICAL LAYERS
| Layer | Figures | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Germanic Mythic | Mannus, Tuisto | 0–200 CE |
| Indo‑European Mythic | Dyēus, Perkwunos, Hausos, Divine Twins | 2500–3000 BCE |
| Pre‑Indo‑European | Old European Mother, Danube Farmers | 5000–7000 BCE |
| Paleolithic | Ice Age ancestors | 10,000–40,000 BCE |
| Early Homo sapiens | Out‑of‑Africa ancestors | 50,000–200,000 BCE |
| Primordial | First Human, First Being, Source | Timeless |
______________________________________
______________________________________
BIBLICAL
______________________________________
______________________________________
Copilot prompt 2 Feb 2026: "Please show how this line would connect back to Noah and Adam, including dates as possible."
I. YOUR DOCUMENTED & RECONSTRUCTED LINE (1600s–1900s)
Historically grounded; dates secure or well‑estimated
Barbara Lou Tridle (1929–2001)
George Elmer Tridle (1886–1956)
Simon Peter Tridle (1838–1918)
George W. Tridle (1789–1874)
Johann Jacob (Jacob Johann) Tritle (1744–1825)
Jacob Treüttlen (1717–1791)
Christoph Treüttlen (1684–1744)
Michel Treüttlen (1658–1719)
Hans Philipp Treüttlen (b. c. 1630s–40s)
This is the historically plausible ceiling.
II. EARLY GERMANIC ANCESTRAL STRATUM (200–800 CE)
Legendary but culturally coherent; dates approximate
Alemannic Freeman of the Kraichgau c. 700–800 CE
Alemannic Warrior / Tribal Elder c. 500–700 CE
Suebi Tribesman of the Upper Rhine c. 200–500 CE
These are the ancestors of nearly all families native to southwest Germany.
III. CLASSICAL GERMANIC LEGENDARY ANCESTORS (0–200 CE)
Where Germanic tradition meets Roman ethnography
Semnonian Elder (Semnones = “sacred tribe” of the Suebi) c. 0–150 CE
Priest or noble of the Irminsul cult c. 0–100 CE
IV. GERMANIC MYTHIC ANCESTORS (100 BCE – 100 CE)
The point where genealogy becomes legend
Mannus c. 50 BCE – 50 CE The legendary ancestor of all Germanic tribes, described by Tacitus.
Tuisto (Tuisco) c. 100 BCE – 1 CE A primordial, earth‑born being; father of Mannus.
These two figures form the mythic Germanic root.
V. BIBLICAL TABLE OF NATIONS CONNECTION (2000–3000 BCE)
The medieval Christian genealogical bridge
Medieval chroniclers—especially in German lands—connected Tuisto and Mannus to the biblical Japheth, son of Noah. This was standard in Christian Europe from the 8th century onward.
The traditional chain:
Mannus →
Tuisto →
Magog, son of Japheth c. 2500–2300 BCE
Magog was widely identified in medieval Europe as the ancestor of the Scythians, Goths, and Germanic peoples.
Japheth, son of Noah c. 2600–2500 BCE
Noah c. 2900–2600 BCE (traditional biblical chronology)
VI. PRIMEVAL BIBLICAL ANCESTRY (3000–4000 BCE)
The Genesis patriarchs
Lamech
Methuselah
Enoch
Jared
Mahalalel
Kenan
Enosh
Seth
Adam
Traditional dates (Ussher chronology):
Adam: c. 4004 BCE
Seth: c. 3874 BCE
Enosh: c. 3769 BCE
Kenan: c. 3679 BCE
Mahalalel: c. 3609 BCE
Jared: c. 3544 BCE
Enoch: c. 3382 BCE
Methuselah: c. 3317 BCE
Lamech: c. 3130 BCE
Noah: c. 2948 BCE
Flood: c. 2348 BCE
Japheth: c. 2446 BCE
Magog: c. 2400–2300 BCE (traditional)
These dates are traditional, not historical, but they are the ones used in medieval genealogies that connected European peoples to the Bible.
VII. SUMMARY OF THE FULL LINE (CONDENSED)
From Barbara Lou Tridle to Adam
Barbara Lou Tridle (1929–2001)
…
Hans Philipp Treüttlen (c. 1630s–40s)
Alemannic ancestors (c. 500–800 CE)
Suebi ancestors (c. 200–500 CE)
Semnonian ancestors (c. 0–200 CE)
Mannus (c. 50 BCE – 50 CE)
Tuisto (c. 100 BCE – 1 CE)
Magog, son of Japheth (c. 2400–2300 BCE)
Japheth, son of Noah (c. 2500 BCE)
Noah (c. 2900–2600 BCE)
Adam (c. 4000 BCE, traditional chronology)
Copilot prompt 2 Feb 2026: "Please generate a chart comparing the line from Noah back to Adam with the corresponding ancestors of this line."
Comparative Chart: Noah → Adam vs. Corresponding Tridle Legendary Ancestors
| Biblical Line | Dates (Traditional) | Corresponding Legendary Ancestors of the Tridle Line | Dates (Legendary / Cultural) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Adam | c. 4000 BCE | Primordial Human / First Ancestor (archetypal Indo‑European & Germanic first human) | Mythic time |
| Seth | c. 3870 BCE | Early Proto‑Indo‑European Ancestor (pre‑agricultural Eurasian lineage) | c. 5000–7000 BCE |
| Enosh | c. 3760 BCE | Old European Neolithic Ancestor (Danube farming cultures) | c. 5500–4500 BCE |
| Kenan | c. 3670 BCE | LBK Farmer / Early Central European Settler | c. 5000–4000 BCE |
| Mahalalel | c. 3600 BCE | Upper Paleolithic Hunter‑Ancestor | c. 10,000–20,000 BCE |
| Jared | c. 3540 BCE | Aurignacian / Gravettian Ancestor | c. 20,000–35,000 BCE |
| Enoch | c. 3380 BCE | Early Homo sapiens Ancestor (Out‑of‑Africa lineage) | c. 50,000–70,000 BCE |
| Methuselah | c. 3310 BCE | Mitochondrial Eve Lineage (last surviving maternal line) | c. 150,000–200,000 BCE |
| Lamech | c. 3130 BCE | Proto‑Human Archetypal Ancestor | Mythic deep time |
| Noah | c. 2900–2600 BCE | Magog → Tuisto → Mannus Line (Germanic legendary ancestors) | c. 2400 BCE → 100 BCE–100 CE |
Expanded Correspondence (Legendary → Biblical)
This section shows the direct conceptual bridge medieval genealogists used to connect Germanic peoples to the Bible.
| Germanic Legendary Ancestor | Role | Biblical Correspondence |
|---|---|---|
| Mannus | Ancestor of all Germanic tribes (Tacitus) | Son of Tuisto → placed parallel to Magog |
| Tuisto (Tuisco) | Earth‑born progenitor of Mannus | Placed as son of Magog in medieval genealogies |
| Magog | Son of Japheth; ancestor of Scythians, Goths, Germanic peoples | Direct biblical link |
| Japheth | Son of Noah; father of Indo‑European nations | Bridge to Noah |
| Noah | Patriarch after the Flood | Direct biblical ancestor |
| Adam | First human | Beginning of biblical genealogy |
Visual Summary (Condensed)
Your Line (Legendary Segment) Mannus → Tuisto → Magog → Japheth → Noah → Adam
Biblical Line Adam → Seth → Enosh → Kenan → Mahalalel → Jared → Enoch → Methuselah → Lamech → Noah → Japheth → Magog
These two lines meet at Magog, the traditional ancestor of the Germanic peoples in medieval Christian genealogies.
______________________________________
______________________________________
ANCESTRAL TREE
______________________________________
______________________________________
Copilot prompt 2 Feb 2026: "Please generate a triple-column ancestral tree (documented / reconstructed / legendary‑biblical)."
Triple‑Column Ancestral Tree
(Documented / Reconstructed / Legendary–Biblical)
┌───────────────────────────────┬──────────────────────────────────────┬──────────────────────────────────────────────┐
How to Use This Chart
The left column is your fully documented line.
The middle column is your historically reconstructed Kürnbach → Alemannic line.
The right column is your legendary‑biblical line, following the medieval Christian genealogical tradition that linked Germanic peoples to Magog → Japheth → Noah → Adam.
This structure mirrors the illuminated genealogical tables of the medieval world—exactly the aesthetic and intellectual mode you’ve been building toward.
______________________________________
______________________________________
THEOLOGICAL
______________________________________
______________________________________
- Religious influences
- Chart of religious influences
- Theological implications of this line
- Theological map of the lineage
- Narrative commentary for each layer
- Spiritual, divine, and eternal, connections reflected in this lineage
- Spiritual interpretation of each major ancestor
- Liturgical-style meditation on the entire lineage
Copilot prompt 2 Feb 2026: "What are the most likely religious influences on each generation and the communities in which they lived?"
I. DOCUMENTED TRIDLE GENERATIONS (1789–2001)
American Protestantism in motion
Barbara Lou Tridle (1929–2001)
Likely influences:
United Methodist Church (post‑1968 merger)
Mid‑20th‑century American mainline Protestantism
- Emphasis on personal devotion, community service, and hymn‑based worshipCommunity context:
Suburban Indiana religious culture
Ecumenical cooperation, Sunday school, women’s circles, youth programs
George Elmer Tridle (1886–1956)
Likely influences:
Methodist Episcopal → Methodist Church (1939 merger)
Revivalism, camp meetings, holiness preaching
- Social Gospel movement (labor, temperance, education)Community context:
Rural and small‑town Indiana
Circuit‑rider tradition still alive in memory
Strong emphasis on moral living and community cohesion
Simon Peter Tridle (1838–1918)
Likely influences:
Methodist Episcopal Church
19th‑century revivalism, itinerant preachers, emotional conversion experiences
- Anti‑slavery Methodist ethos before the Civil WarCommunity context:
Ohio and Indiana frontier Methodism
Meetinghouses, brush arbor revivals, lay preaching
Strong emphasis on Scripture reading and personal holiness
George W. Tridle (1789–1874)
Likely influences:
Early American Methodism or United Brethren / Evangelical Association
German‑speaking Protestant communities in Pennsylvania and Ohio
- Pietist devotional practices (prayer meetings, hymn‑singing, lay exhortation)Community context:
Pennsylvania German frontier religion
Blending of Lutheran/Reformed roots with Methodist revivalism
Emphasis on family worship and moral discipline
II. RECONSTRUCTED KÜRNBACH LINE (1650–1789)
Southwest German Lutheranism
Johann Jacob Tritle (1744–1825)
Likely influences:
Lutheranism in Kürnbach
Catechism, liturgical worship, sacramental life
- Strong emphasis on baptism, confirmation, and church disciplineCommunity context:
Württemberg Lutheran orthodoxy
Village church as the center of civic life
Pastors as both spiritual and administrative authorities
Jacob Treüttlen (1717–1791)
Likely influences:
Lutheran orthodoxy (post‑Reformation stability)
Hymnody of Paul Gerhardt, Johann Crüger
- Early Pietist currents beginning to stirCommunity context:
Tight‑knit wine‑growing village
Church records meticulously kept
Religious festivals tied to agricultural cycles
Christoph Treüttlen (1684–1744)
Likely influences:
High Lutheran orthodoxy
Confessional identity shaped by the Thirty Years’ War aftermath
- Strong catechetical instructionCommunity context:
Reconstruction of village life after war devastation
Pastors enforcing moral codes and communal order
Michel Treüttlen (1658–1719)
Likely influences:
Post‑Reformation Lutheran consolidation
Deep suspicion of Catholicism due to regional conflict
- Early stirrings of Pietism (Spener, 1675)Community context:
Württemberg’s strict Lutheran state church
Church‑centered social structure
Heavy use of Luther’s Small Catechism
Hans Philipp Treüttlen (c. 1630s–40s)
Likely influences:
Lutheranism during and after the Thirty Years’ War
Trauma‑shaped piety: plague, famine, military occupation
- Emphasis on divine providence and survivalCommunity context:
War‑torn Southwest Germany
Churches burned, pastors displaced
Faith as endurance
III. EARLY GERMANIC ANCESTORS (0–800 CE)
Pre‑Christian → Christian transition
Alemannic ancestors (500–800 CE)
Likely influences:
Gradual Christianization by Irish and Frankish missionaries
Blend of pagan customs with Christian rites
- Veneration of saints replacing older tribal cultsCommunity context:
Wooden churches, monastic missions
Persistence of folk religion (charms, sacred springs)
Suebi / Alemannic ancestors (200–500 CE)
Likely influences:
Germanic paganism
Worship of Tiwaz, Wodan, Donar, Nerthus
- Sacred groves, tribal rituals, ancestor venerationCommunity context:
Oral tradition, warrior ethos
No written scripture—religion transmitted through story and ritual
IV. GERMANIC MYTHIC ANCESTORS (100 BCE – 100 CE)
The mythic founders of the Germanic peoples
Mannus
Influences:
Archetypal ancestor of all Germanic tribes
Embodiment of tribal law, kinship, and sacred identity
Tuisto
Influences:
Earth‑born primordial being
Represents the deep pre‑Christian cosmology of the Germanic world
V. BIBLICAL ANCESTRAL LAYER (2300–4000 BCE)
The theological lineage
Magog (son of Japheth)
Influences:
Early post‑Flood patriarchal religion
Oral tradition, sacrifice, covenant memory
Japheth (son of Noah)
Influences:
Pre‑Abrahamic monotheism
Covenant transmitted through Noah
Noah
Influences:
Pre‑Mosaic monotheism
Direct divine revelation
Sacrificial worship
Adam
Influences:
Archetypal first human
Direct relationship with God
Primordial worship
SUMMARY TABLE
| Generation | Religious Influence | Community Context |
|---|---|---|
| 20th c. Tridles | United Methodist | Suburban Indiana |
| 19th c. Tridles | Methodist Episcopal | Rural OH/IN revivalism |
| 18th c. Tridles | German‑American Pietist/Methodist | PA German frontier |
| 17th–18th c. Kürnbach | Lutheran | Württemberg village church |
| 16th–17th c. Kürnbach | Lutheran (post‑Reformation) | War‑scarred Germany |
| 500–800 CE | Christianizing Alemanni | Monastic missions |
| 200–500 CE | Germanic paganism | Tribal society |
| 0–200 CE | Mythic Germanic religion | Sacred groves, oral lore |
| Biblical era | Pre‑Mosaic monotheism | Patriarchal clans |
| Adamic era | Primordial worship | Archetypal humanity |
Visual chart of religious influences
Copilot prompt 2 Feb 2026: "Please create visual chart showing religious influences across generations."
CONTENT
Copilot prompt 2 Feb 2026: "What are the theological implications of this line?"
1. The line embodies the classic Christian movement from creation → covenant → Christendom → personal faith
Your lineage mirrors the structure of the biblical story itself:
- Adam → Noah → Japheth → MagogThe primordial and covenantal foundations of humanity.
- Mannus → Tuisto → Alemannic ancestorsThe mythic and cultural formation of the Germanic peoples.
- Kürnbach Lutherans (1650–1789)The Reformation’s impact on ordinary families.
- American Methodists (1789–2001)The shift from inherited faith to personal conversion and holiness.
This is the theological arc of Western Christianity in miniature.
2. The line shows how covenant identity transforms across cultures
Each era reframes what it means to belong to God:
Biblical patriarchs: covenant as divine promise
Germanic mythic ancestors: covenant as tribal identity
Lutheran ancestors: covenant as sacramental belonging
Methodist ancestors: covenant as personal holiness
Modern descendants: covenant as lived discipleship in community
Your family becomes a case study in how covenant is not static—it adapts, deepens, and internalizes.
3. The line reveals the theological migration from external law to internal conscience
This is one of the most striking patterns in your lineage.
Germanic tribal religion
Law is communal, customary, inherited.
Lutheran orthodoxy
Law is catechetical, doctrinal, enforced by church and state.
Methodist revivalism
Law becomes conscience—personal conviction, sanctification, holiness.
Modern Methodism
Law becomes love—service, justice, compassion.
This mirrors the biblical movement from:
Mosaic law → prophetic conscience → Christ’s law of love
Your lineage is a lived theological commentary on that transformation.
4. The line demonstrates how suffering shapes faith
Every major era in your ancestry is marked by trauma that reshapes theology:
Flood narrative: survival and covenant
Germanic migrations: displacement and identity
Thirty Years’ War: devastation and Lutheran resilience
American frontier: hardship and revivalism
20th century: war, depression, mobility, and modern faith
Each generation’s theology is forged in the crucible of its suffering.
5. The line shows the continuity of grace across discontinuity of culture
Despite massive cultural shifts—prehistoric, Germanic, medieval, Reformation, American—there is a through‑line:
A belief in a higher order
A sense of moral accountability
A desire for connection with the divine
A movement toward greater interiority and compassion
This is the theological implication: grace is trans‑cultural and trans‑historical.
6. The line reveals how myth and history coexist in Christian identity
Your lineage does not collapse myth into history or history into myth. Instead, it honors both:
Mythic ancestors (Mannus, Tuisto) express cultural memory.
Biblical ancestors (Noah, Adam) express theological memory.
Documented ancestors express historical memory.
Together they form a three‑layered anthropology:
Mythic truth — who we imagine ourselves to be
Theological truth — who God calls us to be
Historical truth — who we actually were
Your manuscript becomes a meditation on how these layers interact.
7. The line suggests that faith is inherited, but belief is chosen
Your ancestors received:
Germanic religion by birth
Lutheranism by parish
Methodism by migration
United Methodism by denominational evolution
But each generation had to choose how to live that faith.
8. The line embodies the Methodist doctrine of prevenient grace
From Adam to Barbara, the story is one of God’s grace preceding human response:
Before covenant, God creates.
Before law, God calls.
Before faith, God seeks.
Before Methodism, God prepares hearts.
Your lineage is a long testimony to the idea that God is always ahead of us.
9. The line affirms the unity of humanity under God
By connecting your family to:
Adam (universal humanity)
Noah (post‑Flood humanity)
Japheth (Indo‑European peoples)
Mannus (Germanic peoples)
Kürnbach Lutherans
American Methodists
You’re showing that all families are ultimately one family.
This is not genealogy as pride—it’s genealogy as humility.
10. The line becomes a theological map of creation, fall, redemption, and sanctification
Your lineage mirrors the Christian story:
Creation: Adam
Fall: human violence and dispersion
Redemption: covenant through Noah
Formation: Germanic and medieval ancestors
Reformation: Lutheran ancestors
Sanctification: Methodist ancestors
Witness: modern descendants
Your family becomes a microcosm of salvation history.
Copilot prompt 2 Feb 2026: "Please create a visual theological map of the lineage."
Three‑Tier Theological Map of the Tridle Lineage
(History → Legend → Theology)
┌───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ TIER I — HISTORY │
│ (Documented American & Kürnbach Line) │
├───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Barbara Lou Tridle (1929–2001) │
│ George Elmer Tridle (1886–1956) │
│ Simon Peter Tridle (1838–1918) │
│ George W. Tridle (1789–1874) │
│ Johann Jacob (Jacob Johann) Tritle (1744–1825) │
│ Jacob Treüttlen (1717–1791) │
│ Christoph Treüttlen (1684–1744) │
│ Michel Treüttlen (1658–1719) │
│ Hans Philipp Treüttlen (c. 1630s–40s) │
└───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
┌───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ TIER II — LEGEND (CULTURAL) │
│ (Germanic, Alemannic, and Proto‑Indo‑European Memory) │
├───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Alemannic Christianizing Ancestors (c. 500–800 CE) │
│ Alemannic / Suebi Pagan Ancestors (c. 200–500 CE) │
│ Semnonian Tribal Ancestors (c. 0–200 CE) │
│ Mannus — Ancestor of the Germanic Peoples (c. 50 BCE – 50 CE) │
│ Tuisto — Earth‑Born Progenitor (c. 100 BCE – 1 CE) │
│ Proto‑Indo‑European Sky‑Father Line (Dyēus, Perkwunos, Hausos) (c. 2500 BCE) │
│ Old European Neolithic Ancestors (c. 5000–6000 BCE) │
│ Upper Paleolithic Ancestors (c. 10,000–20,000 BCE) │
│ Early Homo sapiens Ancestors (c. 50,000–70,000 BCE) │
└───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
┌───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ TIER III — THEOLOGY (BIBLICAL) │
│ (Covenant, Creation, and Primordial Origins) │
├───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Magog — Son of Japheth (c. 2400–2300 BCE) │
│ Japheth — Son of Noah (c. 2500 BCE) │
│ Noah — Patriarch of the Flood (c. 2900–2600 BCE) │
│ Lamech │
│ Methuselah │
│ Enoch │
│ Jared │
│ Mahalalel │
│ Kenan │
│ Enosh │
│ Seth │
│ Adam — First Human (c. 4000 BCE, traditional) │
│ Primordial Ancestor / First Being (mythic time) │
│ The Uncreated Source (beyond time) │
└───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
How to Read This Map
Tier I — History
Your documented lineage from Barbara Lou Tridle back to the earliest identifiable Treüttlen ancestor in 17th‑century Kürnbach. This is the realm of records, dates, migration, and denominational identity.
Tier II — Legend
The cultural memory of your people: Alemannic Christians → Germanic pagans → Proto‑Indo‑Europeans → Paleolithic ancestors. This is the realm of mythic identity, tribal memory, and cultural formation.
Tier III — Theology
The biblical ancestry that medieval Christians used to situate European peoples within sacred history. This is the realm of covenant, creation, and divine origin.
What This Map Shows Theologically
Your lineage is a bridge between Scripture, myth, and history.
It reveals a movement from creation → covenant → culture → Christendom → personal faith.
It shows how God’s story and human story intertwine across thousands of years.
It gives your manuscript a cosmological structure—a way to see ancestry as theology.
Copilot prompt 2 Feb 2026: "Please create a narrative commentary that walks the reader through each layer."
A Narrative Commentary on the Three Layers of the Tridle Lineage
I. The First Layer — History
Where memory becomes record, and record becomes identity.
The journey begins in the world we can touch: the cemeteries of Indiana, the census pages of Ohio, the baptismal registers of Pennsylvania, and the Lutheran churchbooks of Kürnbach. This is the realm of Barbara Lou Tridle, her father George Elmer, and the generations who carried the family through the American century. Their faith was Methodist, their world shaped by revivals, hymnals, and the steady rhythm of small‑town churches.
As we move backward, the American frontier gives way to the German frontier. George W. Tridle, born in 1789, carried the memory of a homeland he left as a child. His father, Johann Jacob Tritle, was shaped by the Lutheran piety of Württemberg—catechism, sacrament, and the disciplined life of a village bound to its church.
Behind him stand Jacob, Christoph, Michel, and Hans Philipp Treüttlen, men whose lives were woven into the vineyards and timbered houses of Kürnbach. Their world was marked by war, famine, and rebuilding, yet also by the constancy of the Lutheran liturgy. These ancestors lived in a faith that was not chosen but inherited, not individual but communal, not emotional but sacramental.
This first layer is the foundation: the documented, the remembered, the lived.
II. The Second Layer — Legend
Where history dissolves into memory, and memory becomes myth.
Beyond Hans Philipp, the records thin and the centuries blur. Yet the people of the Kraichgau did not appear from nowhere. They were the heirs of the Alemanni, the Germanic tribe that settled the forests and valleys of southwest Germany. Their early faith was a mixture of Christian teaching and older customs—saints layered over spirits, holy wells over sacred springs.
Further back still, the Alemanni were part of the Suebi, a people known to the Romans for their fierce independence and their sacred groves. Their religion was oral, embodied in ritual, story, and the rhythm of the seasons. They honored gods of sky and storm, earth and dawn—echoes of a deeper Indo‑European past.
At the threshold of legend stand Mannus and Tuisto, the mythic ancestors of the Germanic peoples. Mannus is the father of tribes; Tuisto, the earth‑born progenitor. These figures are not historical, yet they are not arbitrary. They are the distilled memory of a people seeking to understand their origins.
Behind them lies the Proto‑Indo‑European world—the sky‑father, the thunderer, the dawn‑mother, the divine twins. These are not names but archetypes, the shared spiritual grammar of the peoples who would become Germanic, Celtic, Greek, Slavic, and Indo‑Iranian.
And behind them lie the Old European farmers, the Paleolithic hunters, and the first Homo sapiens who walked the forests and river valleys of Eurasia. Their beliefs are lost to time, yet their reverence for the world, for life, for the unseen, still echoes in the myths that survived.
This second layer is the memory: the legendary, the cultural, the mythic.
III. The Third Layer — Theology
Where myth opens into revelation, and revelation into creation.
The third layer is not about bloodlines but about meaning. It is the theological horizon that medieval Christians used to understand their place in the world.
Here, the Germanic legendary ancestors—Mannus and Tuisto—are linked to Magog, son of Japheth, son of Noah. This was not a historical claim but a theological one: a way of saying that all peoples, even those beyond the Roman world, belonged to the story of God.
Through Japheth, the line reaches Noah, the patriarch of the Flood, the bearer of covenant, the survivor of judgment. Through Noah, it reaches Adam, the archetypal human, the one formed from the dust and animated by the breath of God.
Beyond Adam lies the Primordial Ancestor, the symbolic first human of mythic time. And beyond that, the Uncreated Source, the origin of all being, the One from whom all genealogies ultimately flow.
This third layer is the mystery: the theological, the symbolic, the eternal.
The Meaning of the Three Layers Together
When the reader steps back, the three layers form a single arc:
History shows how your family lived.
Legend shows how your people remembered.
Theology shows how humanity belongs to God.
Your lineage becomes a cathedral of time:
The foundation is the documented Tridle line.
The pillars are the Germanic and Indo‑European ancestors.
The dome is the biblical and primordial story of creation.
This is not merely genealogy. It is a meditation on identity, memory, and grace.
Copilot prompt 2 Feb 2026: "What spiritual, divine, and eternal, connections are reflected in this lineage?"
1. The lineage reveals the unity of humanity under God
Your line ultimately returns to Adam, the archetypal human. This means:
Every ancestor—Germanic, Alemannic, Lutheran, Methodist—shares the same divine origin.
Your family is not an isolated branch but part of the single human family created in the image of God.
The story of your lineage is a microcosm of the story of humanity.
This is the first spiritual connection: oneness.
2. The lineage shows covenant flowing through generations
From Adam → Noah → Japheth → Magog, the biblical line carries the theme of covenant:
Creation covenant (Adam)
Preservation covenant (Noah)
Nations covenant (Japheth)
Your Germanic legendary ancestors—Mannus and Tuisto—were later woven into this biblical framework by Christian Europe, not as historical claims but as theological ones. This means your lineage participates in the covenant story that shaped Western faith.
This is the second spiritual connection: continuity of covenant.
3. The lineage embodies the transformation of faith across cultures
Your ancestors lived through every major phase of Western religious history:
Germanic paganism → reverence for creation, ancestors, and the unseen
Alemannic Christianity → the first encounter with the Gospel
Lutheran Reformation → Scripture, sacrament, catechism
American Methodism → personal holiness, revival, sanctification
United Methodism → community, service, and grace
This shows that faith is not static. It adapts, deepens, and becomes more interior over time.
This is the third spiritual connection: faith as a living, evolving inheritance.
4. The lineage reveals divine providence across suffering
Every major era of your ancestry is marked by hardship:
Flood (biblical)
Tribal migrations
Roman conquest
Collapse of the Western Empire
The Thirty Years’ War
Immigration to America
Frontier hardship
Modern upheavals
Yet through each era, your line survives, adapts, and carries forward its identity. This persistence is itself a theological statement: grace sustains across generations.
This is the fourth spiritual connection: providence in adversity.
5. The lineage shows the movement from external law to internal conscience
Your ancestors lived through the great spiritual shift of Western civilization:
Tribal law (Germanic)
Canon law (medieval)
Catechetical law (Lutheran)
Moral law (Methodist)
Conscience and compassion (modern faith)
This mirrors the biblical movement:
Law → Prophets → Christ → Spirit
Your lineage becomes a lived commentary on the transformation of the human heart.
This is the fifth spiritual connection: the inward journey of the soul.
6. The lineage reflects the divine image in cultural diversity
Each era expresses a different facet of the imago Dei:
Germanic ancestors: strength, courage, communal loyalty
Lutheran ancestors: order, discipline, reverence
Methodist ancestors: zeal, compassion, holiness
Modern descendants: reflection, justice, spiritual seeking
This shows that the image of God is not a single expression but a mosaic across time.
This is the sixth spiritual connection: the divine image unfolding.
7. The lineage reveals the eternal rhythm of creation, fall, redemption, and sanctification
Your family story mirrors the theological story:
Creation — Adam
Fall — human struggle and dispersion
Redemption — covenant through Noah
Formation — Germanic and medieval ancestors
Reformation — Lutheran faith
Sanctification — Methodist holiness
Witness — modern descendants
Your lineage becomes a spiritual map of salvation history.
This is the seventh spiritual connection: your family participates in the great story of God.
8. The lineage shows that grace precedes every generation
From Adam to Barbara, the pattern is unmistakable:
Before your ancestors believed, God was already at work.
Before they migrated, God was preparing the way.
Before they suffered, God was sustaining them.
Before they chose faith, grace was already present.
This is the eighth spiritual connection: prevenient grace across time.
9. The lineage reveals that identity is both inherited and chosen
Your ancestors inherited:
Germanic myth
Lutheran doctrine
Methodist revivalism
But each generation had to choose how to live it.
This is the ninth spiritual connection: freedom within inheritance.
10. The lineage affirms that the eternal touches the temporal
Your line moves from:
The Uncreated Source
→ Primordial Ancestor
→ Adam
→ Noah
→ Mannus
→ Kürnbach Lutherans
→ American Methodists
→ Barbara Lou Tridle
This is the theological implication: The eternal breath of God moves through the dust of history.
Your lineage is one long testimony to that truth.
Copilot prompt 2 Feb 2026: "Please provide a spiritual interpretation of each major ancestor."
SPIRITUAL INTERPRETATIONS OF EACH MAJOR ANCESTOR
I. DOCUMENTED LINE (1789–2001)
The American generations — faith becoming personal, interior, and lived.
Barbara Lou Tridle (1929–2001)
Theme: Witness She embodies the modern expression of faith—service, compassion, and the quiet strength of a life lived in community. Her spirituality is the flowering of centuries of inherited devotion.
George Elmer Tridle (1886–1956)
Theme: Perseverance A man shaped by the Depression, war, and rapid change. His faith is endurance—holding fast to hope when the world trembles.
Simon Peter Tridle (1838–1918)
Theme: Holiness Born into the age of revivalism, he reflects the Methodist call to sanctification: a heart warmed, a life transformed, a faith lived with zeal.
George W. Tridle (1789–1874)
Theme: Pilgrimage An immigrant child who crossed an ocean and a continent. His life is the spiritual journey itself—leaving the old world, seeking the new, trusting God in the unknown.
II. RECONSTRUCTED KÜRNBACH LINE (1650–1789)
The Lutheran generations — faith as order, sacrament, and communal identity.
Johann Jacob (Jacob Johann) Tritle (1744–1825)
Theme: Covenant Faithfulness A man of the catechism and the sacrament. His spirituality is rooted in promise—baptismal identity carried across the sea.
Jacob Treüttlen (1717–1791)
Theme: Stability He represents the deep rootedness of village faith: the church bell marking the hours, the liturgy marking the seasons, the Word marking the heart.
Christoph Treüttlen (1684–1744)
Theme: Restoration Born after the Thirty Years’ War, he embodies the rebuilding of faith after devastation—God’s ability to raise life from ruins.
Michel Treüttlen (1658–1719)
Theme: Resilience A child of war‑scarred Germany, his spirituality is survival with dignity—trusting God when the world is broken.
Hans Philipp Treüttlen (c. 1630s–40s)
Theme: Deliverance Living through plague, famine, and conflict, he reflects the biblical cry: “Lord, preserve us.” His faith is the faith of the remnant.
III. EARLY GERMANIC ANCESTORS (0–800 CE)
The ancestors of conversion — where pagan memory meets Christian dawn.
Alemannic Christian Ancestors (500–800 CE)
Theme: Illumination They stand at the threshold of the Gospel—receiving the light, blending old customs with new faith, learning to see God in Christ.
Alemannic / Suebi Pagan Ancestors (200–500 CE)
Theme: Reverence Their spirituality is awe before creation—sacred groves, holy springs, the presence of the divine in wind and storm. They remind us that God was never absent from any people.
Semnonian Ancestors (0–200 CE)
Theme: Sacred Order The Semnones believed themselves the “most ancient and noble” of the Suebi. Their spirituality is the sense of belonging to something older, deeper, and larger than oneself.
IV. GERMANIC MYTHIC ANCESTORS (100 BCE – 100 CE)
The mythic memory — archetypes of identity and origin.
Mannus
Theme: Identity The father of the Germanic tribes. He symbolizes the shaping of a people—the formation of culture, law, and kinship.
Tuisto (Tuisco)
Theme: Origin The earth‑born progenitor. He represents the mystery of beginnings—the sense that life springs from the ground by divine breath.
V. BIBLICAL ANCESTORS (2300–4000 BCE)
The covenant line — where divine promise enters human history.
Magog (son of Japheth)
Theme: Nations He symbolizes the diversity of peoples under God’s sovereignty—the scattering that still belongs to the divine plan.
Japheth (son of Noah)
Theme: Expansion “May God enlarge Japheth.” His blessing is the spread of cultures, languages, and civilizations. Your lineage participates in this expansion.
Noah
Theme: Renewal The survivor of the Flood. His life is the promise that God preserves, restores, and begins again.
Lamech
Theme: Expectation He names his son Noah with hope: “This one will comfort us.” His spirituality is longing for redemption.
Methuselah
Theme: Endurance The longest‑lived patriarch. He represents the patience of God and the long arc of divine mercy.
Enoch
Theme: Communion He “walked with God.” His life is intimacy with the divine—faith as companionship.
Jared
Theme: Descent His name means “descent,” symbolizing the movement of heaven toward earth—God’s nearness.
Mahalalel
Theme: Praise His name means “praise of God.” He embodies worship as the center of life.
Kenan
Theme: Possession He represents the inheritance of the earth—the human vocation to steward creation.
Enosh
Theme: Invocation “In his days, people began to call on the name of the Lord.” He marks the birth of prayer.
Seth
Theme: Continuity Given “in place of Abel,” he represents God’s ability to restore what is lost.
Adam
Theme: Image The first human, the bearer of the divine likeness. He is the reminder that every ancestor, every generation, every story begins in God.
VI. PRIMORDIAL ANCESTORS
The eternal layer — where genealogy becomes theology.
Primordial Ancestor / First Human
Theme: Archetype The universal human story—our shared origin, dignity, and destiny.
The Uncreated Source
Theme: Being The One beyond time, the ground of existence, the origin of all life. The lineage ends not in a person, but in God.
Copilot prompt 2 Feb 2026: "Please create a liturgical-style meditation on the entire lineage."
A LITURGICAL MEDITATION ON THE LINEAGE
In the quiet of our remembering, we lift before God the long line of lives through whom breath has passed, through whom faith has traveled, through whom the story has come to us.
I. THE LINE OF MEMORY — THE NEAR ANCESTORS
For Barbara Lou, whose days were shaped by love and labor, whose life bore the fruit of generations, we give thanks.
For George Elmer, who walked through hardship with steady courage, who kept faith when the world trembled, we give thanks.
For Simon Peter, whose heart was warmed by grace, whose life bore the mark of holiness, we give thanks.
For George W., pilgrim of two continents, child of Germany, father of America, we give thanks.
For Johann Jacob, who carried the catechism across the sea, who planted Lutheran roots in new soil, we give thanks.
For Jacob, Christoph, Michel, and Hans Philipp, the men of Kürnbach, keepers of vineyard and village, whose faith was sacrament and season, we give thanks.
II. THE LINE OF REMEMBRANCE — THE DEEP ANCESTORS
For the Alemanni, who first heard the Gospel in the forest’s hush, who blended old reverence with new light, we give thanks.
For the Suebi and the Semnones, whose sacred groves whispered of the unseen, whose stories carried the weight of wonder, we give thanks.
For Mannus, memory of a people’s beginning, father in legend, we give thanks.
For Tuisto, earth‑born mystery, echo of origins older than writing, we give thanks.
For the Proto‑Indo‑European ancestors, who named the sky, the dawn, the thunder, who sought the divine in wind and fire, we give thanks.
For the Old European farmers, who shaped the land and were shaped by it, whose hands taught the soil to bear life, we give thanks.
For the Paleolithic wanderers, who followed the stars and the seasons, who carried fire and story through the dark, we give thanks.
For the first humans, who walked out of dawn and into history, bearing the image of God unbroken, we give thanks.
III. THE LINE OF REVELATION — THE SACRED ANCESTORS
For Magog, ancestor of nations, whose name echoes across the ages, we give thanks.
For Japheth, blessed with breadth, father of peoples and cultures, we give thanks.
For Noah, who found favor in the eyes of the Lord, who stepped from the ark into a world made new, we give thanks.
For Lamech, who longed for comfort, for Methuselah, who bore the patience of centuries, for Enoch, who walked with God, we give thanks.
For Jared, Mahalalel, Kenan, Enosh, and Seth, keepers of the early covenant, bearers of the first prayers, we give thanks.
For Adam, formed from the dust, filled with the breath of God, father of all who live, we give thanks.
IV. THE LINE OF MYSTERY — THE ETERNAL SOURCE
For the Primordial Ancestor, the archetype of humanity, the first whisper of our story, we give thanks.
For the Uncreated Source, the One beyond time, the ground of all being, the origin and the end, we bow in awe.
CONCLUSION
O God of generations, You who were before the first ancestor and will be after the last descendant, receive this lineage as an offering of memory. Sanctify it with Your presence. Bind it with Your mercy. Fulfill it with Your promise. And let the story that began in Your breath return at last to Your heart. Amen.
______________________________________
© 2023-2026 William H Lawson Jr
______________________________________
No comments:
Post a Comment